Activities of Ukrainian Banks in the Government Bond Market as a Factor of the Financial Intermediation Paradox
Verheliuk Y. Y., Hantsiak M. O.

Verheliuk, Yuliia Yu., and Hantsiak, Mykhailo O. (2025) “Activities of Ukrainian Banks in the Government Bond Market as a Factor of the Financial Intermediation Paradox.” The Problems of Economy 1:288–295.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-1-288-295

Section: Finance and banking

UDC 336.27+331.339

Abstract:
The relevance of the article’s topic is explained by the matter that Ukrainian banks, despite unfavorable macroeconomic conditions, possess significant liquidity and demonstrate a substantial positive financial outcome. Meanwhile, the pace of credit support for the economy remains low, while Ukrainian banking institutions are actively involved in the government bond market. The aim of the article is to substantiate the presence of manifestations of the financial intermediation paradox, which is reflected in the excessive activity of Ukrainian banking institutions in the government bonds market. This is proved by analyzing the activities of Ukrainian banks in the market of government debt instruments, as well as assessing their lending activity. In particular, the article provides the calculation of the credit penetration indicator, which reflects the share of loans issued by banks in relation to GDP. Against the background of a similar indicator of foreign countries in Ukraine, this indicator demonstrates an insufficient level. Even despite low economic activity and a number of problems related to the ongoing military actions, the demand for credit resources remains for certain categories of businesses. However, banks do not meet this demand for a number of objective and subjective reasons. An analysis has been conducted on the dynamics of the indicator reflecting the permissible activity of banks in the government bonds market, specifically the ratio of their investments to deposits. The limit for this indicator is set at 35%, which means that the deposit base should not be used for budgetary debt financing beyond this share. Nevertheless, in Ukraine during the analyzed period the indicator exceeded the established limit. Banks actively meet the demand in the domestic market of government debt instruments, which is verified by the ownership structure of Ukrainian government bonds. The National Bank of Ukraine also holds a significant share among the owners of government bonds. The article describes the reasons for the demand for government bonds among banks in Ukraine. A significant interest is shaped by the policy of the central bank, including the NBU’s stimulating measures, such as the ability to use government bonds as collateral for refinancing loans and to form reserves in government bonds. This accounting policy is reflected in the cost of credit services of banks and the weighted average rates on government bonds. The latter appear more significant and, considering their reliability, serve as a competitive alternative to lending to the economy. In conclusion, it is noted that the activity of banks in the government bond market may be one of the reasons for the displacement of credit activity and is a factor in the formation of the financial intermediation paradox in the banking system of Ukraine.

Keywords: banking activity, financial intermediation paradox, government bonds, credit services, investment, banking assets, government securities.

Fig.: 4. Tabl.: 2. Bibl.: 13.

Verheliuk Yuliia Yu. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Financial Markets and Technologies, State Tax University (31 Universytetska Str., Irpin, Kyiv region, 08205, Ukraine)
Email: strchk81@gmail.com
Hantsiak Mykhailo O. – PhD, Head of the Department, Department of Financial Policy, State Scientific Research Institute for Informatization and Modeling Economy (38 Mykoly Mikhnovskoho Blvd., Kyiv, 01014, Ukraine)
Email: m.hantsyak@ukr.net

List of references in article

“Osnovni pokaznyky diialnosti bankiv. Nahliadova statystyka NBU“ [Main Indicators of Bank Activity. Supervisory Statistics of the NBU]. Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/supervision-statist
Kushch, O. “Yak perestaty «sydity na trylionakh» i vidrodyty kredytuvannia biznesu“ [How to Stop "Sitting on Trillions" and Revive Business Lending]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. 2024. https://zn.ua/ukr/macroeconomics/jak-perestati-siditi-na-triljonakh-j-vidroditi-kredituvannja-biznesu.html
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2017). https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/PB17179
“Valovyi vnutrishnii produkt (u faktychnykh tsinakh)“ [Gross Domestic Product (in Current Prices)]. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
Bohdan, T. “Yak dostup do kredytiv vyznachaie riven ekonomichnoho zrostannia?“ [How Does Access to Credit Determine the Level of Economic Growth?]. Ekonomichna pravda. 2023. https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2023/04/27/699542/
Verheliuk, Yu. Yu., and Hantsiak, M. O. “Variatyvnist «efektu vytisnennia» na rynku Derzhavnoho borhu Ukrainy“ [Variability of the “Crowding Out Effect” in the Ukrainian Government Debt Market]. Gesellschaftsrechtliche transformationen von wirtschaftlichen systemen in den zeiten der neo-industrialisierung. Nuremberg, Germany : Verlag SWG imex GimbH, 2020. https://ir.dpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2983
“OVDP, yaki znakhodiatsia v obihu za nominalno-amortyzatsiinoiu vartistiu“ [Government Bonds in Circulation at Nominal and Amortized Cost]. Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/markets/t-bills
Verheliuk, Yu. Yu., and Hantsiak, M. O. “Vzaiemodiia bankivskoho ta borhovoho sehmentiv v umovakh povoiennoi transformatsii finansovoho prostoru“ [Interaction between the Banking and Debt Segments in the Post-war Transformation of the Financial Space]. Finansovyi prostir Ukrainy v umovakh hlobalizatsiinykh i dehlobalizatsiinykh transformatsii. Irpin : Derzhavnyi podatkovyi un-t, 2023. https://ir.dpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/782
“Statystyka finansovykh rynkiv“ [Financial Markets Statistics]. Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/sector-financial#1ms
“The Pictet Group. The investment landscape in 2025“. 2024. https://am.pictet.com/ch/en/institutions/investment-views/multi-asset/2025/annual-outlook-for-2025
Buriachenko, A., and Borodenko, T. “Vplyv bankiv na rynok derzhavnykh tsinnykh paperiv v umovakh povnomasshtabnoho vtorhnennia: vyklyky ta stratehii adaptatsii“ [The Impact of Banks on the Government Securities Market in the Face of a Full-scale Invasion: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies]. Moderni finansy: hlobalni vyklyky i suchasni trendy. Ternopil : Ekon. dumka, 2024. http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/52866/1/Monogr_Fin_forum.pdf#page=576
Shah, A. “As bank stress mounts, are bonds a good investment?“ Goldman Sachs. 2023. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/as-bank-stress-mounts-are-bonds-a-good-investment
Fang, X., Hardy, B., and Lewis, K. K. “Who holds sovereign debt and why it matters“. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES. 2024. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30087/w30087.pdf