The Triad of the Paradigm of Ensuring Crisis Management for Sustainable Development of Enterprises
Prokhorova V. V., Yukhman Y. V., Shcherbyna Y. V.

Prokhorova, Viktoriia V., Yukhman, Yaryna V., and Shcherbyna, Yevhen V. (2025) “The Triad of the Paradigm of Ensuring Crisis Management for Sustainable Development of Enterprises.” The Problems of Economy 2:134–142.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-2-134-142

Section: Economics and Enterprise Management

UDC [005.21:005.336]:338.1

Abstract:
The relevance of the research is determined by the necessity for scientific substantiation and practical implementation of mechanisms for integrating crisis management with sustainable development strategies. The formation of an effective management triad becomes a guarantee not only for preserving the viability of enterprises during a crisis period but also for creating the foundations for their sustainable growth in the post-crisis perspective. The aim of the article is to develop a conceptual model of the triad of the paradigm of ensuring crisis management for the sustainable development of enterprises, which integrates strategic, tactical, and operational levels of management decisions and allows for increasing the effectiveness of crisis measures in conjunction with long-term development goals. The paradigm of the management triad is substantiated, integrating the strategic, tactical, and operational levels of crisis management into a single coherent system. This structure enables systematic management of the enterprise in the context of changes in the external environment and fosters sustainable development even amid high levels of uncertainty and risks. At the strategic level, long-term goals for sustainable development are established, crisis policies are formed, event development scenarios are created, and mechanisms for adaptation to megatrends are developed. The tactical level focuses on adapting internal resources, crafting managerial decisions, synchronizing changes, and coordinating interactions among the enterprise’s subsystems. The operational level includes the implementation of crisis measures in real-time, ensuring operational control, reporting, and supporting critical business processes. An applied model of the triad, tailored to the specifics of the enterprise’s operations, is proposed, which is based on a combination of scenario planning, digital monitoring tools, effective evaluation, and automated feedback mechanisms. This allows for the implementation of the triad not only as a conception but as a practical management mechanism in the context of constant dynamics of change. A system for comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of the triad’s implementation has been developed, which takes into account financial, operational, organizational, and strategic indicators of sustainability. The focus is on integral coefficients of responsiveness, adaptability, and long-term growth. It is proved that the proposed triad helps avoid the fragmentation of management processes, minimizes duplication of functions, and losses of management integrity. It creates a strategically managed and technologically flexible system capable of effectively functioning in conditions of crisis and uncertainty.

Keywords: crisis management, provision, sustainability, development, enterprise, mechanism, strategy.

Fig.: 5. Tabl.: 3. Bibl.: 16.

Prokhorova Viktoriia V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Economics and Management, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (4 Svobody Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine)
Email: vkprohkorova@gmail.com
Yukhman Yaryna V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Enterprise Economics and Investment, National University «Lviv Polytechnic» (12 Stepana Bandery Str., Lvіv, 79013, Ukraine)
Email: yaryna2003@gmail.com
Shcherbyna Yevhen V. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Economics and Management, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (4 Svobody Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine)
Email: shcheririna63@gmail.com

List of references in article

Arefiev, S. O., and Tszifan, Ch. “Osoblyvosti antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v systemi stratehichnykh imperatyv“ [Features of Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise in the System of Strategic Imperatives]. Aktualni problemy innovatsiinoho rozvytku klasternoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini. 2017. https://er.knutd.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7425
Ovcharenko, A. Yu., and Krush, P. V. “Analiz osnovnykh metodyk antykryzovoho upravlinnia finansovo-ekonomichnoiu diialnistiu pidpryiemstva“ [Analysis of the Main Methods of Anti-crisis Management of the Financial and Economic Activities of an Enterprise]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia. 2011. https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/12291
Sova, O. Yu., and Morozov, Ye. Yu. “Suchasna paradyhma antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom“ [The Modern Paradigm of Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise]. Vcheni zapysky Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia : Ekonomika i upravlinnia. 2020. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/UZTNU_econ_2020_31(70)_2(2)__10
Buhai, V. Z., and Burka, M. H. “Zhyttievyi tsykl yak instrument antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom“ [Life Cycle as a Tool for Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo. 2017. https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/12_ukr/32.pdf
Yepifanova, I., and Bolotnov, D. “Mistse stratehii v systemi antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy“ [The Place of Strategy in the System of Anti-crisis Management of Enterprises]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, no. 3 (2022): 335-338.
Marachevska, A. “Praktychna tsinnist antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom u voiennyi ta pisliavoiennyi chas v Ukraini“ [The Practical Value of Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise in Wartime and Post-war Times in Ukraine]. SWorldJournal, no. 13-02 (2022): 8-13.
Shatailo, O. A. “Zmistovna kharakterystyka systemy antykryzovoho upravlinnia“ [Content Description of the Crisis Management System]. Biznes Inform, no. 5 (2019): 217-22.
Yurynets, O. V. “Sutnist ta znachennia urhentnykh instrumentiv antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy“ [The Essence and Importance of Urgent Anti-crisis Management Tools for Enterprises]. Economic journal Odessa polytechnic university, no. 1(15) (2021): 92-100.
Akhnovska, I. O., and Panasiuk, P. I. “Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v umovakh ekonomiky minimalnoho kontaktu“ [Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise in a Minimal Contact Economy]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 166 (2021): 42-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/166-7
Pavlin, P. D. “Restrukturyzatsiia ta upravlinskyi reinzhynirynh yak instrumenty antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom“ [Restructuring and Management Reengineering as Tools for Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 200 (2025): 313-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.200.313-319
Ilkiv, O. “Osoblyvosti antykryzovoho menedzhmentu ta roli kerivnyka pidpryiemstva v umovakh viiny“ [Features of Anti-crisis Management and the Role of the Enterprise Manager in Wartime]. Via Economica, no. 6 (2024): 28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8559/2024-6-4
Kostakova, L. D., and Teslenko, O. S. “Antykryzove upravlinnia - osnova zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva“ [Anti-crisis Management is the Basis for Ensuring the Economic Security of an Enterprise]. Ekonomika. Finansy. Pravo. 2021. https://elar.navs.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/25443
Varaksina, O. V., and Zhovnir, V. I. “Problematyka antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom u suchasnykh realiiakh“ [The Problems of Anti-crisis Management of an Enterprise in Modern Realities]. Naukovyi visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu, no. 7-8(308-309) (2023): 20-25. DOI: 10.32680/2409-9260-2023-7-8-308-309-20-25
Tymoshenko, O. V., Butska, O. Yu., and Safari, F. Kh. “Antykryzove upravlinnia yak peredumova pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstva“ [Anti-crisis Management as a Prerequisite for Increasing the Efficiency of an Enterprise]. Ekonomichnyi analiz, vol. 23, no. 2 (2016): 187-192.
Nazarova, L. V. “Neobkhidnist antykryzovoho upravlinnia na pidpryiemstvi“ [The Need for Crisis Management at the Enterprise]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky. 2018. http://global-national.in.ua/archive/23-2018/55.pdf
Konenko, V. V. “Tsyfrovyi instrumentarii antykryzovoho upravlinnia biznesom v period voiennoho stanu“ [Digital Tools for Anti-crisis Business Management During Martial Law]. Efektyvna ekonomika. 2023. https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/ee/article/view/1018