|
Platform-Based and Data-Driven Models for the Development of Organized Commodity Markets Klymenko S. M., Petrashko O. H.
Klymenko, Svitlana M., and Petrashko, Oleksiy H. (2025) “Platform-Based and Data-Driven Models for the Development of Organized Commodity Markets.” The Problems of Economy 4:24–32. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-4-24-32
Section: World economy and international relations
Article is written in UkrainianDownloads/views: 0 | Download article in pdf format -  |
UDC 339.17:330.342.2
Abstract: The relevance of this research is determined by the transformation of organized commodity markets under the influence of digitalization and the spread of platform-based and data-driven business models, which fundamentally change the mechanisms of liquidity formation, pricing, and market competition. With the growing role of data as an economic asset, traditional exchange institutions are confronted with the need to adapt to new technological and regulatory requirements. For Ukraine, this issue acquires special significance given the wartime challenges, the necessity to ensure economic resilience, and integration into the European economic space. The aim of this article is to examine platform-based and data-driven models of organized commodity market development in the context of digitalization and to determine their institutional and technological implications for the national economy. The study employs methods of institutional analysis, comparative analysis, a structural-functional approach, and qualitative case analysis of organized commodity markets. The theoretical foundation combines the tenets of multi-sided platform theory and institutional economics, allowing commodity markets to be understood as complex digital ecosystems. The study substantiates that platform business models facilitate the shift from transaction-oriented exchanges to data-driven ecosystems, where market data becomes a key source of value creation. An asymmetry in the development of digital platforms in Ukraine’s commodity markets has been identified, manifesting in the uneven development of trading, post-trading, and analytical components. It is demonstrated that the implementation of algorithmic trading mechanisms, market oversight, and digital infrastructure is not merely a technological choice but an institutional prerequisite for the functioning of organized commodity markets in the contemporary regulatory environment. The practical value of this article lies in the potential to use the obtained results to develop strategies for the growth of organized commodity markets, enhance regulatory approaches, and design digital platforms in the fields of energy, agricultural production, and public asset management. The proposed conclusions may be useful for government authorities, exchange operators, and market participants when developing solutions aimed at increasing the transparency, liquidity, and investment attractiveness of commodity markets in the context of digital transformation.
Keywords: organized commodity markets, exchange trading, platform economy, data-driven business models, digital platforms, data economy, commodity market regulation.
Tabl.: 2. Bibl.: 30.
Klymenko Svitlana M. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (54/1 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine) Email: klymenko.svitlana@kneu.edu.ua Petrashko Oleksiy H. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (54/1 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine) Email: lx2503@gmail.com
List of references in article
Aaltonen A., Alaimo C. & Kallinikos J. (2021). The making of data commodities: data analytics as an embedded process. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2(38), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1912928
Atlantic Council – UkraineAlert. (2025). Ukraine defies Russian invasion and advances European energy integration. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukraine-defies-russian-invasion-and-advances-european-energy-integration/
CEER / ACER. (2024). ACER Market Monitoring Report 2020 Gas Wholesale Markets – Volume. CEER / ACER. https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ACER-Market-Monitoring-Report-2020-Gas-Wholesale-Markets-Volume.pdf
CME Group Investor Relations. (2025). CME Group investor presentation. CME Group. https://www.cmegroup.com/investor-relations/files/cme-group-investor-presentation.pdf
Covantis. (2025). Covantis expands its digital platform scope to optimize trading firms’ contractual positions. Covantis. https://covantis.io/covantis-expands-its-digital-platform-scope-to-optimize-trading-firms-contractual-positions/
CTRM Center. (2025). Traders in EU string markets come together within Covantis to net positions before contract execution. CTRM Center. https://www.ctrmcenter.com/news/traders-in-eu-string-markets-come-together-within-covantis-to-net-positions-before-contract-execution/
Denyer Willis G. (2023). ‘Trust and safety’: exchange, protection and the digital market–fortress in platform capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 4(21), 1877–1895. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad003
EarthDaily Agro. (2025). Digital Ag. EarthDaily Agro. https://ag.earthdaily.com/digital-ag
Energy Community. (2021). SEEGAS Report December 2021. Energy Community. https://www.energy-community.org/dam/jcr:c0f2ebe2-3ef7-4959-a46a-4d227ebb875a/ECS%20_SEEGASReport_dec21.pdf
Energy Security UA. (2025). Ukraine advances REMIT implementation. Energy Security UA. https://energysecurityua.org/news/ukraine-advances-remit-implementation/
European Commission. (2024). Ukraine Report 2024. Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1924a044-b30f-48a2-99c1-50edeac14da1_en?filename=Ukraine%20Report%202024.pdf
Farmonaut. (2025). Farmonaut precision analytics transform ag futures trading. Farmonaut. https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/farmonaut-precision-analytics-transform-ag-futures-trading
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2025). Algorithmic trading compliance in wholesale markets. FCA. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/multi-firm-reviews/algorithmic-trading-compliance-wholesale-markets.pdf
FMSB. (2025). Spotlight Review: Emerging themes and challenges in algorithmic trading and machine learning. FMSB. https://fmsb.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/FMSB-Spotlight-Review-%E2%80%98Emerging-themes-and-challenges-in-algorithmic-trading-and-machine-learning.pdf
Google Cloud Customers. (2025). CME Group customer story. Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/customers/cme-group
Hillis B., Goligorsky S. & Ammons J. T. (2025, September 28). Algorithmic trading in power and gas markets: Uses, trends and regulatory considerations in EU, UK and United States. Reed Smith. https://www.reedsmith.com/articles/algorithmic-trading-power-gas-markets-uses-trends-eu-uk-united-states/
ICE. (2025). Exchange data – Fixed Income, Data Services & Analytics. ICE. https://www.ice.com/fixed-income-data-services/data-and-analytics/exchange-data
Koelmel B., Fischer L. & Juraschek E. (2024). Navigating the Challenges of Commodity Traps and Platform Economies: An Assessment in the Context of the Northern Black Forest Region and Future Directions. Commodities, 3(3), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities3030018
Kurbet O., Bublyk Y. & Slyvka T. (2023). Development of natural gas exchange infrastructure: European experience and Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(9), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-5-130-142
Maslov D. (2022). Digital goods and digital commodities. Economic Innovations, 4 (85)(24), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2022.24.4(85).115-122
Miller R. S. (2025, July 25). Artificial intelligence and derivatives markets: Policy issues. Congressional Research Service (CRS). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13072
Open Contracting. (2025). Evidence of impact. Open Contracting. https://www.open-contracting.org/impact/evidence/
Rechtsteiner R., Schabram J. & Thomas A. (2023). The future of commodity trading. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/electric-power-and-natural-gas/our-insights/the-future-of-commodity-trading
Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. (2020). Report on the Risks and Benefits of Modern Market Structure: Subcommittee on Developments in Automated and High Frequency Trading. U.S. SEC. https://www.sec.gov/files/algo_trading_report_2020.pdf
Shapoval N., Brik T., Mylovanov T., Vohra R., Sobolev O. & Mykhaylov I. (2019). Selling non-performing loans: new evidence from Ukraine: report. Kyiv School of Economics (KSE). https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NPL-KSE-04.22.2019.pdf
Sharifi Poor Bgheshmi M. S., SharajSharifi M. & Saeidabadi M. R. (2025). Between exploitation and resilience: Reconciling AI’s role in surveillance capitalism and disaster risk management. Cyberspace Studies. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2025.396045.1165
Taeuscher K. & Laudien S. M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 3(36), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005
United Nations Public Administration Network (UNPAN). (2019). Prozorro.Sale - world’s most transparent e-auction system for public assets management. UN Public Service Award – Case Details. UNPAN. https://publicadministration.un.org/unpsa/en/Home/Case-Details-Public?PreScreeningGUID=82e298fb-d579-45dd-a7c3-915f181444f2&ReadOnly=Yes&ReturnURL=http://publicadministration.un.org/unpsa/database/Home/infrastructure-industrialization
Yukins C. R. (2022). Overcoming corruption and war – lessons from Ukraine’s reconstruction. GW Law Faculty Publications. https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2887&context=faculty_publications
Zhou X., Xiao J. & Xue X. (2023). A platform ecosystem evolution model with service dynamic supply and matching. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3332064
|