The Theoretical Approaches to the Essence of the Concept of «Critical Infrastructure»: International, Spatial, and Resilience Dimensions
Khaustova V. Y., Trushkina N. V.

Khaustova, Viktoriia Ye., and Trushkina, Nataliia V. (2025) “The Theoretical Approaches to the Essence of the Concept of «Critical Infrastructure»: International, Spatial, and Resilience Dimensions.” The Problems of Economy 4:336–351.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-4-336-351

Section: Economic theory

UDC 330.3:338.4

Abstract:
The article conducts a comprehensive theoretical and methodological analysis and systematization of approaches to the essence of the concept of «critical infrastructure», considering international, spatial, and resilience dimensions. The relevance of the study is driven by the increasing military, technological, climatic, and cyber threats, as well as the challenges of Ukraine’s post-war recovery, which necessitate a reassessment of the role of critical infrastructure in ensuring territorial resilience, continuity of essential services, and the stable functioning of the national economy. The methodological foundation of the study consists of a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications indexed in the Scopus database, a comparative analysis of national and supranational approaches to defining critical infrastructure, as well as a synthesis of international regulatory documents and contemporary scientific conceptions in the fields of security, risk management, and resilience. The combination of bibliometric and qualitative analytical methods made it possible to trace the evolution of scientific approaches to the interpretation of critical infrastructure and identify key directions in the transformation of this concept under modern conditions. The study highlights and systematizes the dominant theoretical approaches to interpreting critical infrastructure, including the functional, consequence-oriented, system-network, spatial, risk-oriented, and resilience approaches. It has been substantiated that most existing definitions are fragmentary in nature and focus primarily on sectoral or functional aspects, without fully taking into account the territorial location of infrastructure facilities, intersectoral interdependencies, the network structure of infrastructure systems, and the potential for cascading effects in case of disruptions. It has been demonstrated that integrating spatial and resilience approaches allows for an expansion of the traditional understanding of critical infrastructure, interpreting it not as a static characteristic of individual facilities, but as a dynamic property of infrastructure systems, shaped by territorial conditions, the level of intersectoral interdependence, the range of threats, and the capacity for adaptation and recovery. On this basis, an integrated approach to identifying critical infrastructure has been substantiated, which combines spatial, resilience, and risk-oriented dimensions and creates the methodological prerequisites for a comprehensive assessment of the criticality level of infrastructure systems. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in their potential use for improving State policy in the field of critical infrastructure, developing spatial development and territorial security strategies, as well as implementing the Build Back Better principles in the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine’s economy, taking into account the objectives of increasing the resilience and adaptability of infrastructure systems.

Keywords: national economy, critical infrastructure, spatial dimension, system-network approach, intersectoral interdependencies, risk-oriented approach, resilience, threats, cascading effects, infrastructure security, risk management, Build Back Better principle,

Fig.: 4. Tabl.: 4. Bibl.: 40.

Khaustova Viktoriia Ye. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Director, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: v.khaust@gmail.com
Trushkina Nataliia V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow, Sector of Industrial Policy and Innovative Development of the Department of Industrial Policy and Energy Security, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: trushkina@nas.gov.ua

List of references in article

Ahmed C. M., Mathur A. P. & Fulmer H. (2018). Challenges and approaches for intrusion detection in industrial control systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 3(20), 2152–2175. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2791584
Bezpartochnyi M., Khaustova V. & Trushkina N. (2024). Investment support for the critical infrastructure development of territorial communities in the conditions of post-war reconstruction of the Ukrainian economy. Plovdiv: Higher School of Security and Economics Publishing Complex. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12519297
Bruneau M., Chang S. E. & Eguchi R. T. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 4(19), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
Buldyrev S. V., Parshani R., Paul G., Stanley H. E. & Havlin S. (2010). Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature, 464, 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08932
Council of the European Union. (2008, December 8). Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0114
Der Sarkissian R., Diab Y. & Vuillet M. (2023). The “Build-Back-Better” concept for reconstruction of critical infrastructure: A review. Safety Science, 157, 105932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105932
Dunn M. & Wigert I. (2004). International CI protection policy and research: A state of the art. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI).
European Commission (2023). Recovery and Resilience Facility. Brussels: European Commission. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/eu-recovery-instruments/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2022, December 14). Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2557
Fountas P., Tsiakos K., Gkonis K., Fylakis M. A. & Menis M. (2021). Intrusion Detection in Critical Infrastructures: A Literature Review. Smart Cities, 3(4), 1146–1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4030061
ISO (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management – Guidelines. Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
ISO (2019). ISO 22301:2019 Security and resilience – Business continuity management systems – Requirements. Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html
Khaustova V. Ye. & Reshetniak O. I. (2023). Rezylientnist ekonomiky: sutnist i vyklyky dlia Ukrainy [Economic resilience: essence and challenges for Ukraine]. Biznes Inform, 7, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-7-30-41
Khaustova V. Ye. & Trushkina N. V. (2025). Zahrozy rozvytku krytychnoi infrastruktury: sutnist i klasyfikatsiia [Threats to critical infrastructure development: essence and classification]. Problemy ekonomiky, 3, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-3-89-104
Khaustova V. Ye., Trushkina N. V. & Pronoza P. V. (2025). Identyfikatsiia elementiv krytychnoi infrastruktury: zakordonnyi i vitchyznianyi dosvid [Identification of critical infrastructure elements: foreign and domestic experience]. Biznes Inform, 8, 47–71. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-8-47-71
Kyzym M. O., Khaustova V. Ye. & Trushkina N. V. (2022). Sutnist poniattia «krytychna infrastruktura» z pozytsii natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Essence of the concept of "critical infrastructure" from the standpoint of national security of Ukraine]. Biznes Inform, 12, 58–78. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-12-58-78
Lampropoulos G., Larrucea X. & Colomo-Palacios R. (2024). Digital Twins in Critical Infrastructure. Information, 8(15), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080454
NATO. Baseline Requirements for National Resilience: policy baseline and guidance materials. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_132722.htm
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). Good Governance for Critical Infrastructure Resilience. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/gov/good-governance-for-critical-infrastructure-resilience.htm
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018). Building Resilient Infrastructure for Sustainable Development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/environment/cc/building-resilient-infrastructure-for-sustainable-development.htm
Ottawa : Government of Canada, Public Safety Canada. (2009). National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ rsrcs/pblctns/srtg-crtcl-nfrstrctr/index-en.aspx
Ouyang M. (2014). Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
Ouyang M. (2016). Critical location identification and vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 154, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.007
Pederson P., Dudenhoeffer D., Hartley S. & Permann M. (2006). Critical infrastructure interdependency modeling: A survey of U.S. and international research. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Laboratory.
Rinaldi S. M., Peerenboom J. P. & Kelly T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 6(21), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131
Sathurshan M., Saja A., Thamboo J., Haraguchi M. & Navaratnam S. (2022). Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks. Infrastructures, 5(7), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7050067
Sathurshan M., Gohari S., Bagchi A. & Mostafavi A. (2022). Resilience of critical infrastructure systems: A systematic literature review of measurement frameworks. Infrastructures, 5(7), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7050067
Smith K. & Wilson I. D. (2023). Critical infrastructures: a comparison of definitions. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 4(19), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2023.132213
Tao F., Zhang H., Liu A. & Nee A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 4(15), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
UK Government. Critical National Infrastructure (CNI): policy framework and guidance materials. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/critical-national-infrastructure
UNDRR (2017). Build Back Better in Recovery, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction: Sendai Framework Guidance. Geneva: UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org/publication/build-back-better-recovery-rehabilitation-and-reconstruction
United Nations (2024). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) (2023). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2023. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). https://www.undrr.org/publication/global-assessment-report-disaster-risk-reduction-2023
Wang F., Magoua J. J. & Li N. (2022). Modeling cascading failure of interdependent critical infrastructure systems using HLA-based co-simulation. Automation in Construction, 133, 104008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104008
Washington, DC: The White House. (2013). Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-21: Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. https://obamwhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security
World Bank (2019). Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1430-3
World Bank (2022). Rebuilding for Resilience: Infrastructure Recovery after Conflict. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/37735
World Bank (2024). Ukraine Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA4). Washington, DC: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ ukraine/publication/rdna4
World Economic Forum (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024
Zio E. (2016). Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 152, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009