The Efficiency of Fiscal Consolidation Under Structural Shocks: An Empirical Analysis of Ukraine
Artiukh O. V., Havryliuk Y. V., Danyliuk K. V., Tsekhotskyi L. Y.

Artiukh, Oksana V. et al. (2026) “The Efficiency of Fiscal Consolidation Under Structural Shocks: An Empirical Analysis of Ukraine.” The Problems of Economy 2:366–378.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2026-2-366-378

Section: Mathematical methods and models in economy

UDC 336.02:338.124.4(477)

Abstract:
The article examines the efficiency of fiscal stimulus in Ukraine under structural shocks during 2018–2026. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that, in periods of severe macroeconomic instability, actual budget indicators do not provide a sufficient basis for assessing the true stance of fiscal policy. An increase in the budget deficit or a decline in tax revenues may reflect not only discretionary government decisions, but also the automatic response of public finances to output fluctuations, changes in the tax base, wartime distortions, and external financing constraints. The aim of the article is to identify Ukraine’s structural fiscal impulse and assess its impact on real GDP dynamics.The methodological framework combines several econometric approaches. The output gap is estimated using statistical filtering techniques, including the Hodrick-Prescott filterandthe Hamilton filter. ARDL and DOLS models are applied to estimate long-run tax elasticities and to assess the sensitivity of budget revenues to macroeconomic dynamics. These estimates are then used to construct the cyclically adjusted fiscal position and to derive the structural fiscal impulse. The dynamic effects of fiscal impulse on economic activity are evaluated using a structural vector autoregression model and the local projections method. The results show that Ukraine’s fiscal policy during 2018-2026 was predominantly reactive rather than systematically countercyclical. Fiscal expansion generated a positive short-term response of economic activity, but this effect quickly weakened and did not translate into sustained output growth. The findings indicate that the fiscal multiplier in Ukraine is constrained by high import dependence, exchange rate and monetary restrictions, rising debt pressure, wartime risks, and limited domestic production capacity. A particularly important channel is the import leakage of fiscal stimulus, whereby part of the additional demand generated by public spending is redirected toward foreign goods and services rather than domestic output. The article substantiates that, in Ukraine’s case, fiscal expansion can serve as an emergency stabilization tool, but it cannot ensure long-term growth unless it is accompanied by a structural reorientation of public spending toward domestic value added,investmentpotential, and fiscal sustainability.

Keywords: fiscal impulse; fiscal stimulus; output gap; structural shocks; cyclically adjusted balance; tax elasticities; SVAR; Ukraine.

Fig.: 5. Tabl.: 4. Formulae: 9. Bibl.: 18.

Artiukh Oksana V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Professor, Department of Finance, Odesa National Economic University (8 Preobrazhenska Str., Odesa, 65082, Ukraine)
Email: oksana_art_2017@ukr.net
Havryliuk Yurii V. – Masters Student, Odesa National Economic University (8 Preobrazhenska Str., Odesa, 65082, Ukraine)
Email: ugavryliuk90@gmail.com
Danyliuk Kateryna V. – Student, Odesa National Economic University (8 Preobrazhenska Str., Odesa, 65082, Ukraine)
Email: katerynadanylyuk@gmail.com
Tsekhotskyi Lev Yu. – Student, Odesa National Economic University (8 Preobrazhenska Str., Odesa, 65082, Ukraine)
Email: lev.tsekhotskyi@gmail.com

List of references in article

Auerbach A. J. & Gorodnichenko Y. (2010). Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1667585
Blanchard O. & Perotti R. (2002). An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4(117), 1329–1368. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043
Bouthevillain C., Cour-Thimann P., van den Dool G., Hernandez de Cos P., Langenus G., Mohr M., Momigliano S. & Tujula M. (2001). Cyclically Adjusted Budget Balances: An Alternative Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.356222
Bardsen G. (2009). Estimation of Long Run Coefficients in Error Correction Models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 3(51), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1989.mp51003008.x
Brezinski C. (2018). La methode de Cholesky. Revue d'histoire des mathematiques, 2(11), 205–238. https://doi.org/10.24033/rhm.30
Fedelino A., Horton M. & Ivanova A. (2009). Computing Cyclically-Adjusted Balances and Automatic Stabilizers. Technical Notes and Manuals, 05, 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781462359622.005
Girouard N. & Andre C. (2006). Measuring Cyclically-Adjusted Budget Balances for OECD Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005002
Hamilton J. D. (2018). Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick-Prescott Filter. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 5(100), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00706
Hodrick R. J. & Prescott E. (1997). Post-war US business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(29). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2953682
Ilzetzki E., Mendoza E. G. & Vegh C. A. (2012). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers?. Journal of Monetary Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030439321200116X
Jorda O. (2005). Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections. American Economic Review, 1(95), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828518
Kaminsky G. L., Reinhart C. M. & Vegh C. A. (2004). When It Rains, It Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 19, 11–53. https://doi.org/10.1086/ma.19.3585327
Marcellino M., Stock J. H. & Watson M. W. (2006). A comparison of direct and iterated multistep AR methods for forecasting macroeconomic time series. Journal of Econometrics, 1–2(135), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.020
OECD (2015). The State of Public Finances 2015: Strategies for Budgetary Consolidation and Reform in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264244290-en
Pesaran M. H., Shin Y. & Smith R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3(16), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Sarr A. (2000). Financial Liberalization, Bank Market Structure, and Financial Deepening: An Interest Margin Analysis. IMF Working Papers, 38(00), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451845686.001
Stock J. H. & Watson M. W. (1993). A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica, 4(61), 783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763
Vdovychenko A. (2018). Estimating the Fiscal Impulse in Ukraine. Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine, 245, 54–72. https://doi.org/10.26531/vnbu2018.245.03