УКР
ENG
Search


BREXIT: Preconditions, Consequences, Interests and the Main Vectors of Interstate Relations of Great Britain in the Sphere of Trade
Shkurupii O. V., Svitlychna A. V., Zahrebelna I. L., Svitlychna O. A.

Shkurupii, Olha V. et al. (2022) “BREXIT: Preconditions, Consequences, Interests and the Main Vectors of Interstate Relations of Great Britain in the Sphere of Trade.” The Problems of Economy 3:12–19.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2022-3-12-19

Section: World economy and international relations

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

Download article in pdf format -

UDC 327.339.5

Abstract:
The carried out analysis reflects the essence and course of the Brexit process. In terms of essence, the Great Britain’s exit from the EU should be considered a complex transformational process, which in a real form reproduces the model of structural changes occurring within the framework of a non-balanced open system (dissipative structure). Such a conceptual approach to the interpretation of this process allows us to specify the definition of Brexit as a solution to the intra-system contradiction that has formed within the most complex form of integration, which is the European Union. With the transformation (transformation of the form) and structural changes occurring along this process, a new quality of the basic system together with the separated former elements of this system, which have acquired the status of independent integral system units, is formed. In the future, the dynamics may take the form of either progress or regression. Accordingly, Brexit as a result of the transformation of the economic and political union of European countries is fraught with risks for both sides – as for Great Britain, so for the EU. The economic system of Great Britain is one of the largest and most productive in Europe and the world. Therefore, Brexit has significantly weakened the EU economy, but has not caused a critical deterioration in its condition. Similarly, the Great Britain’s loss of the EU membership, which the country had since 1973, had hindered the possibilities of growth, but did not cause a devastating change in the economy. The situation in the sphere of international trade appears to be similar. For Great Britain, the Brexit transition period has become extremely difficult, as it largely coincided with the protracted period of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a response to the challenges facing the country after Brexit, Great Britain is implementing a model of interstate relations aimed at preserving the partnerships acquired during the period of the EU membership and at the same time forming new ones, being no less effective. Within the limits of this model, the most likely format of equally close economic (including trade) relations «countries of Europe – Great Britain – the USA» will be formed. Trade relations with China remain mutually beneficial for Great Britain, although their context has become significantly politically determined, given the divergence of the interests of the USA and China and the Great Britain’s loss of the role of a conductor of Chinese interests in the EU. Great prospects are opened to Great Britain by the direction of Indo- and Asia-Pacific cooperation, which involves developing relations with countries, the vast majority of which are participants in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).

Keywords: Brexit, relationship models, trade relations, Great Britain, the EU.

Fig.: 1. Tabl.: 2. Bibl.: 20.

Shkurupii Olha V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Professor, Department of Economics and International Economic Relations, Poltava State Agrarian University (13 Skovorody Str., Poltava, 36003, Ukraine)
Email: olha.shkurupii@pdaa.edu.ua
Svitlychna Alla V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Director, Educational and Scientific Institute of Economics, Management, Law and Information Technologies, Poltava State Agrarian University (13 Skovorody Str., Poltava, 36003, Ukraine)
Email: alla.svitlychna@pdaa.edu.ua
Zahrebelna Iryna L. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Economics and International Economic Relations, Poltava State Agrarian University (13 Skovorody Str., Poltava, 36003, Ukraine)
Email: iruna.zagrebelna@pdaa.edu.ua
Svitlychna Olha A. – Student, Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (60 Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine)
Email: oljasvitlychna@gmail.com

List of references in article

Sidenko, V. R. “Kryzovi protsesy u rozvytku intehratsii v YeS: vytoky ta perspektyvy“ [Crisis Processes in the Development of Integration in the EU: Origins and Prospects]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia, no. 1 (2017): 7-31.
Hrubinko, A. V., and Martynov, A. Yu. Yevropeiskyi Soiuz pislia Brexit: prodovzhennia istorii [The European Union after Brexit: The Continuation of the Story]. Ternopil: Osadtsa Yu. V., 2021.
Edgington, T. “Brexit: What trade deals has the UK done so far?“ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47213842
Mudra, Ya. A. “Ekonomichni efekty dezintehratsiinoho protsesu Brexit u torhivli“ [Economic Effects of the Brexit Deintegration Process in Trade]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia. 2021. http://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/30_2021/5.pdf
“Slovo Brexit ziavylosia v Oksfordskomu slovnyku anhliiskoi movy“ [The Word Brexit Appeared in the Oxford English Dictionary]. BBC. 2016. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/news-38325994
Toffler, E. Tretia Khvylia [The Third Wave]. Kyiv: Vsesvit, 2000.
Kelly, J. “Sterling rises for third day afterpost-referendumplunge“. Reuters. June 30, 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N19M1ZX
“Reyting stran po VVP (PPS). The World Bank“ [Ranking of Countries by GDP (PPP). The World Bank]. NONEWS. https://nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/gdp-ppp
“European Union GDP Data: Value, Growth Rate, Per Capita And Structure“. TAKE-PROFIT.ORG. https://take-profit.org/en/statistics/gdp/european-union/
“Statistics on UK-EU trade. Library House of Commons. By Matthew Ward 3 December 2021“. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7851/CBP-7851.pdf
Butorina, O. “Suzheniye Yevropeyskogo Soyuza i potentsial integratsii“ [Contraction of the European Union and the Potential for Integration]. Sovremennaya Yevropa, no. 2 (2020): 20-32.
“House of Commons Library. 2020. «Geographical pattern of UK trade», Briefing Paper 7593, 25 November 2020“. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7593/CBP-7593.pdf
Global Britain in a competitive age. The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy. UK: APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 2021.
“HM Treasury. 2016. HM Treasury analysis: the long-term economic impact of EU membership and the alternatives, April 2016“. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/517415/treasury_analysis_economic_impact_of_eu_membership_web.pdf
“Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the one part, and the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the other part. Treaty Series No.8 (2021)“. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/982648/TS_8.2021_UK_EU_EAEC_Trade_and_Cooperatio
Elliott, L. “Why Brexit is a chance to fix the UK economy`s long-term problems“. The Guardian. January 31, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/31/why-brexit-is-chance-to-fix-uk-economy-long-term-problems
Gillham, J. et al. “Leaving the EU: Implications for the UK economy“. PricewaterhouseCoopers UK - 2016. https://www.pwc.co.uk/economic-services/assets/leaving-the-eu-implications-for-the-uk-economy.pdf
“UK-US Free Trade Agreem“. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/869592/UK_US_FTA_negotiations.pdf
“Global Britain. Sixth Report of Session 2017-2019. 12.03.2018. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee“ https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm 201719/cmselect/cmfaff/780/780.pdf.
“World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. 2021. GDP growth (annual%). United Kingdom“. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=GB

  The Promblems of Economy, 2009-2024 The site and its metadata are licensed under CC-BY-SA. Write to webmaster